What MoFEM offers?
<!--
See https://www.debugbear.com/blog/responsive-images#w-descriptors-and-the-sizes-attribute and
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Multimedia_and_embedding/Responsive_images for info on defining 'sizes' for responsive images
-->
<source
class="responsive-img-srcset"
srcset="/assets/img/posts/mofem_modules-480.webp 480w,/assets/img/posts/mofem_modules-800.webp 800w,/assets/img/posts/mofem_modules-1400.webp 1400w,"
type="image/webp"
sizes="95vw"
>
<img
src="/assets/img/posts/mofem_modules.jpg"
class="img-fluid rounded z-depth-1"
width="100%"
height="auto"
title="mofem modules overview"
data-zoomable
loading="lazy"
onerror="this.onerror=null; $('.responsive-img-srcset').remove();"
>
</picture>
</figure>
</div>
</div>
Examples of user modules implemented using MoFEM .
The core developers of MoFEM identify the following list of unique features that distinguishes its library from competitors like dealii, MFEM, libMesh, FEniCS, FreeFEM++, MOOSE. This is not an exhaustive list but it shows what are the key strengths of MoFEM.
MoFEM features:
- Versatility in developing finite elements
- Allows for an extensive experimentation with mixing various spaces, types of base functions and dimensions
- Provides a numerical analysis research tool for solving PDEs
- It is not limited to research, it allows for solving complex engineering problems combining many types of elements, material models, boundary conditions and more
- Enables multiphysics, digital twins, data-driven mechanics research and development
... all models are approximations. Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful. —Norman Draper
–>
Enjoy Reading This Article?
Here are some more articles you might like to read next: